Originally posted by Ignis:No, 8192 is just an scripted boundary. Originally posted by TheGraveDigger:Actually it’s more than half as deep In Below Zero it feels more like classwork I'm forced to do with no pleasure or enjoyment.Īny 'space' in Below Zero is ruined and cramped with caves and terrain.Īny 'open area' in Below Zero is ruined by being barren or uninteresting.Īnd how are they going to explain Sector Zero's existence? Subnautica took place inside the crater of a massive volcano.Īctually before I go on to talk about the story line of Sector Zero I think I'll make a topic to discuss that subject on its own.

Land and Caves were either tiny or optional for the most part and a JOY to explore in Subnautica.

Wow, you compare Subnautica's depths to Below Zero's depths as if BZ has a leg to stand on?īelow Zero does not go down as deep as Subnautica.īelow Zero does not hold a candle to Subnautica's depths or diversity.īelow Zero does not have the content to contend with Subnautica.īelow Zero has land portions forced on the player.īelow Zero has cave systems forced on player. Then come back and go deeper, and the linear boring uneventful path into the Fabricator caverns where the only literal thing to do is make AL-ANs body and leave. The Biome above it, the Lost River, is gigantic, and the combined biomes of ILZ and ALZ are tremendous and expansive.Ĭompare that to the barren and boring journey through the Crystal Caverns to find AL-ANs body part, then leave. That’s only 230 m difference from half of subnauticas depth Except there's SO MUCH MORE of Subnautica's 980m depth area. Subnautica goes down to 1500, which divided by 2 is 750 Originally posted by Kvakosavrus:And underwater part of BZ is just tiny - only quarter of original game :( Actually it’s more than half as deep

Subnautica vs below zero map